🔗 Share this article

A digital rights organization has claimed to have scraped millions of tracks from Spotify and is getting ready to publish them publicly.

Possible Boost for Artificial Intelligence Training

Industry experts noted the seeming leak could boost AI companies searching for data to develop their models.

An entity known as Anna’s Archive reported it had obtained 86 million music files from Spotify and 256 million rows of associated data such as artist and album names. Spotify, which hosts more than 100 million songs, confirmed that the breach did not represent its full inventory.

“We have identified and disabled the malicious user accounts that engaged in illegal scraping,” said a company spokesperson.

The Swedish company, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, further explained that an investigation into unauthorised access found a third party collected public metadata and employed questionable tactics to bypass DRM protections.

Group's Stated Mission and Worries

The streaming service does not believe the audio taken by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for offering links to copyright-infringing books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

The group asserted the audio files accounted for 99.6% of all music listened to by its listeners and would be shared via ‘torrents’, a means of exchanging large digital files online.

“Of course the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic beginning,” said Anna’s Archive, which frames its purpose as “safeguarding humanity’s knowledge and heritage”.

AI Training and Copyright Battleground

A composer and campaigner for protecting artists’ rights, said the leaked music would probably be utilized for developing artificial intelligence systems.

“Training on pirated material is unfortunately widespread in the AI industry, so this stolen music is highly likely to end up instructing AI models,” he stated.

The Anna’s Archive site alludes to a large online archive, a huge online repository of copyrighted books that has allegedly been used by the parent company of Facebook to develop its systems.

The co-founder of an artificial intelligence company wrote on LinkedIn that individuals of the public could in principle “build their own private free version of Spotify”. The executive added it could also allow tech companies to “train on modern music at a large volume”.

Copyright has become a battleground between artists, writers and creatives on one side and AI companies on the other.

Policy Proposals and Reactions

Across Britain, artists and writers have protested against a ministerial suggestion to allow AI companies use protected work without permission unless the rights holder opts out. Almost every participant to a government call for evidence on the idea has supported artists’ apprehensions.

A government minister for technology, innovation and development told parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the matter, noting that ministers would “take the time to get this correct”. The government has committed to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by next year.